“The ‘gay closest friend’ trope is homosexuality on right people’s terms. We deserve better. “
Gays! They’re every-where these full times: inside our houses, within our groups, inside our politics, and flocking together like tropical birds on our truth shows.
When it comes to television representation, we’re doing a lot better than before. We’ve got gay wizards, homosexual superheroes and homosexual teenage detectives on our displays. We’ve got trans and sex characters that are non-binary a few television shows, such as for example Orange could be the brand New Ebony and clear. But as heartening since it is seeing LGBTQI individuals on display screen, showrunners nevertheless have actually a responsibility to ensure these figures tend to be more than easy ticks in a field.
We deserve figures that fulfil more function than just being on-screen and homosexual. We deserve a lot better than the storied and‘gay that is egregious friend’.
Where There’s A Will (And Grace) There’s A Way
The homosexual friend that is best happens to be A tv basic for many years now. If there’s a lady on television having intimate dilemmas, you better think there is certainly a sassy homosexual label offering her wise yet arch advice. Think Stanford Blatch from Intercourse plus the City, who was simply defined by the endless hunger for Carrie’s non-stop drama and bad relationship alternatives. He had been the template for the homosexual friend that is best — the Platonian ideal.
George from Julia Robert’s most readily useful movie My Best Friend’s Wedding was another notable person in the GBF (Gay closest friend) vanguard.
They constantly be seemingly males aswell, utilizing the few types of lesbian closest friend managing to fall outside of the traits with this trope. This is certainly most likely because lesbian exposure on tv is significantly reduced than homosexual guys (imagine if Buffy started a trope of lesbian close friends who like to flay guys with dark miracle). Continue reading “Is television Finally Ditching The ‘Gay Best Friend’?”